CDN77 vs Microsoft

CDN77 is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete.

Category by category

Each provider's cheapest published option in each category, on the axis that category is billed on. A dash means they do not sell into it.

CategoryCDN77RateMicrosoftRateCheaper
CDN & edge deliveryCDN77$0.025Azure Front Door$0.081CDN773.2× cheaper
Cloud compute & VPSAzure Virtual Machines$0.052only one competes
GPU cloudAzure ND H100 v5$6.98only one competes
Object storageAzure Blob Storage$0.018only one competes
Managed databasesAzure Database for PostgreSQL$12.41only one competes

About each provider

CDN77

Headquartered in GB · 2 priced services

A CDN sold mainly on committed-volume contracts for video delivery, with unmetered options that suit high-bandwidth streaming better than per-gigabyte rates do.

Microsoft

Headquartered in US · 6 priced services

Azure is the default cloud inside enterprises already licensed for Microsoft software, where existing agreements usually matter more to the final bill than list price does.

Questions

Is CDN77 or Microsoft cheaper in 2026?
CDN77 is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete. Picking a provider on an aggregate "cheaper" verdict is usually a mistake — what matters is which of them is cheaper in the categories you actually buy.
What does CDN77 offer that Microsoft does not?
Nothing in this dataset — every category CDN77 sells into, Microsoft sells into as well.
What does Microsoft offer that CDN77 does not?
In this dataset: Cloud compute & VPS, GPU cloud, Object storage, Managed databases. CDN77 has no priced equivalent in those categories.
Should I use both?
Often the cheapest answer, and the table above shows where the seams are. Splitting workloads across providers costs you cross-provider data transfer and a second bill to reason about, so it pays off when the per-category gap is large and the traffic between them is small.

Compare the individual products