CDN77 vs Google
CDN77 is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete.
Category by category
Each provider's cheapest published option in each category, on the axis that category is billed on. A dash means they do not sell into it.
| Category | CDN77 | Rate | Rate | Cheaper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN & edge delivery | CDN77 | $0.025 | Google Cloud CDN | $0.080 | CDN773.2× cheaper |
| Cloud compute & VPS | — | — | Google Compute Engine | $0.048 | only one competes |
| GPU cloud | — | — | Google Cloud A3 | $6.98 | only one competes |
| Object storage | — | — | Google Cloud Storage | $0.020 | only one competes |
| Managed databases | — | — | Google Cloud SQL | $9.37 | only one competes |
About each provider
CDN77
Headquartered in GB · 2 priced services
A CDN sold mainly on committed-volume contracts for video delivery, with unmetered options that suit high-bandwidth streaming better than per-gigabyte rates do.
Headquartered in US · 6 priced services
Google Cloud for infrastructure and the Gemini API for models. Compute pricing is competitive with AWS, and sustained-use discounts apply automatically rather than requiring a commitment.
Questions
- Is CDN77 or Google cheaper in 2026?
- CDN77 is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete. Picking a provider on an aggregate "cheaper" verdict is usually a mistake — what matters is which of them is cheaper in the categories you actually buy.
- What does CDN77 offer that Google does not?
- Nothing in this dataset — every category CDN77 sells into, Google sells into as well.
- What does Google offer that CDN77 does not?
- In this dataset: Cloud compute & VPS, GPU cloud, Object storage, Managed databases. CDN77 has no priced equivalent in those categories.
- Should I use both?
- Often the cheapest answer, and the table above shows where the seams are. Splitting workloads across providers costs you cross-provider data transfer and a second bill to reason about, so it pays off when the per-category gap is large and the traffic between them is small.