CDN77 vs Cloudflare
Cloudflare is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete.
Category by category
Each provider's cheapest published option in each category, on the axis that category is billed on. A dash means they do not sell into it.
| Category | CDN77 | Rate | Cloudflare | Rate | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN & edge delivery | CDN77 | $0.025 | Cloudflare CDN | Free | Cloudflare |
| Object storage | — | — | Cloudflare R2 | $0.015 | only one competes |
| Serverless functions | — | — | Cloudflare Workers | $5.00 | only one competes |
About each provider
CDN77
Headquartered in GB · 2 priced services
A CDN sold mainly on committed-volume contracts for video delivery, with unmetered options that suit high-bandwidth streaming better than per-gigabyte rates do.
Cloudflare
Headquartered in US · 3 priced services
An edge-first network that made zero egress fees its main commercial weapon. Storage and CDN products undercut the hyperscalers specifically on data transfer out.
Questions
- Is CDN77 or Cloudflare cheaper in 2026?
- Cloudflare is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete. Picking a provider on an aggregate "cheaper" verdict is usually a mistake — what matters is which of them is cheaper in the categories you actually buy.
- What does CDN77 offer that Cloudflare does not?
- Nothing in this dataset — every category CDN77 sells into, Cloudflare sells into as well.
- What does Cloudflare offer that CDN77 does not?
- In this dataset: Object storage, Serverless functions. CDN77 has no priced equivalent in those categories.
- Should I use both?
- Often the cheapest answer, and the table above shows where the seams are. Splitting workloads across providers costs you cross-provider data transfer and a second bill to reason about, so it pays off when the per-category gap is large and the traffic between them is small.