Akamai vs CDN77
CDN77 is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete.
Category by category
Each provider's cheapest published option in each category, on the axis that category is billed on. A dash means they do not sell into it.
| Category | Akamai | Rate | CDN77 | Rate | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN & edge delivery | Akamai CDN | $0.085 | CDN77 | $0.025 | CDN773.4× cheaper |
| Cloud compute & VPS | Linode (Akamai Cloud) | $0.0075 | — | — | only one competes |
| Object storage | Linode Object Storage | $0.020 | — | — | only one competes |
About each provider
Akamai
Headquartered in US · 3 priced services
The original CDN, which acquired Linode in 2022 to add compute. Enterprise delivery pricing is negotiated, while the Linode-derived cloud products are published and flat-rate.
CDN77
Headquartered in GB · 2 priced services
A CDN sold mainly on committed-volume contracts for video delivery, with unmetered options that suit high-bandwidth streaming better than per-gigabyte rates do.
Questions
- Is Akamai or CDN77 cheaper in 2026?
- CDN77 is cheaper in all 1 categories where both compete. Picking a provider on an aggregate "cheaper" verdict is usually a mistake — what matters is which of them is cheaper in the categories you actually buy.
- What does Akamai offer that CDN77 does not?
- In this dataset: Cloud compute & VPS, Object storage. CDN77 has no priced equivalent in those categories.
- What does CDN77 offer that Akamai does not?
- Nothing in this dataset — every category CDN77 sells into, Akamai sells into as well.
- Should I use both?
- Often the cheapest answer, and the table above shows where the seams are. Splitting workloads across providers costs you cross-provider data transfer and a second bill to reason about, so it pays off when the per-category gap is large and the traffic between them is small.