CockroachDB Cloud vs Turso

CockroachDB Cloud and Turso cannot be scored on the same axes — one of them does not publish a rate for everything managed databases bills on.

List prices checked

Rate cards side by side

Only the axes at least one of them bills on. A dash means that provider does not charge for it.

Billing axisCockroachDB CloudTursoDifference
Entry plan$25.00/mo$8.25/mo3× Turso
Storage$0.500/GB-mo
Free tierYesYes

Source: Cockroach Labs pricing (May 2026) · Turso pricing (May 2026). Published list prices only — committed-use discounts, regional variation, and per-request charges are not included. Not yet independently re-checked against the vendor’s page.

Monthly cost for three real workloads

The rate cards applied to identical usage. This is where the winner changes.

WorkloadCockroachDB CloudTursoCheaper
Side projectA personal site or small app with modest traffic, a few gigabytes of assets, and one small always-on process.$35Not comparable
Growing SaaSA funded product serving a few thousand daily users, with an image-heavy frontend and two application servers.$275Not comparable
Media-heavy siteA publisher or video product where delivery dominates the bill and compute is almost an afterthought.$1,025Not comparable

Workload definitions are identical on every comparison page, so figures here can be read against any other pair in the same category.

What each one is for

CockroachDB Cloud

by Cockroach Labs

Distributed SQL with Postgres wire compatibility and multi-region strong consistency, billed on request units. Priced for workloads that genuinely need survivability across regions.

Free tier: $0 basic tier with monthly request-unit and storage allowances

Turso

by Turso

SQLite replicated to the edge and billed on row reads and writes, which makes read-heavy workloads extremely cheap and write-heavy ones a poor fit.

Free tier: 500 databases, 9 GB of storage, and 1 billion row reads per month

Common questions

Is CockroachDB Cloud or Turso cheaper in 2026?
Neither can be scored across all three workloads, because at least one of them does not publish a rate for every axis this category bills on.
Which has the better free tier, CockroachDB Cloud or Turso?
Both publish one. CockroachDB Cloud: $0 basic tier with monthly request-unit and storage allowances. Turso: 500 databases, 9 GB of storage, and 1 billion row reads per month.
What do these estimates not include?
Committed-use and reserved discounts, regional price variation, per-request API charges, support plans, and minimum retention periods. All of those move real invoices, sometimes by a lot. These figures compare published list prices for the same workload, which is the comparison the rate cards alone cannot give you.

Other comparisons in this category