Cheapest VPS for a side project

One small always-on server for a hobby app, with traffic in the low hundreds of gigabytes.

List prices checked

How this is scored

Scored on the entry plan plus 300 GB of transfer. Providers that bundle generous traffic win here even when their sticker price is higher, which is the opposite of how these are usually ranked.

All 11, ranked for this workload

#ServiceProviderCost for this workloadNotes
1Vultr Cloud ComputeVultr$2.50/mo all inNone; the $2.50 IPv6-only plan is the entry point
2Hetzner CloudHetzner$3.79/mo all in20 TB of traffic included with every server
3DigitalOcean DropletsDigitalOcean$4.00/mo all in500 GB to 1 TB of pooled egress per Droplet
4IONOS Cloud ServersIONOS$4.00/mo all inUnlimited traffic included
5OVHcloud VPSOVHcloud$4.20/mo all inUnmetered traffic on most VPS plans
6Linode (Akamai Cloud)Akamai$5.00/mo all in1 TB of egress included on the $5 plan
7UpCloudUpCloud$5.00/mo all in
8AWS LightsailAmazon Web Services$5.00/mo all inThree months free on the smallest plan
9Contabo VPSContabo$5.50/mo all inUnlimited traffic, throttled after 32 TB
10Scaleway InstancesScaleway$7.20/mo all in
11DigitalOcean KubernetesDigitalOcean$15/mo all inControl plane free on the standard tier

Published list prices only. Rows that do not publish a rate for an axis this workload depends on are excluded rather than shown as cheap.

Questions

Cheapest VPS for a side project in 2026?
Vultr Cloud Compute from Vultr — $2.50/mo all in. Hetzner Cloud is second at $3.79/mo all in. This ranking is specific to the workload described above; a different usage shape reorders it.
How is this ranking weighted?
Scored on the entry plan plus 300 GB of transfer. Providers that bundle generous traffic win here even when their sticker price is higher, which is the opposite of how these are usually ranked.
Why does this differ from the general cheapest list?
Because a single price axis never describes a real workload. Ranking by headline rate answers "who is cheapest per unit"; this page answers "who is cheapest for this job", and the two orders are often very different — which is the whole reason it exists as a separate table.
What is not accounted for?
Committed-use discounts, regional price variation, per-request charges, support plans, and minimum retention. These are published list prices applied to one stated workload — a shortlist to price properly with the vendor, not a quotation.

Other workloads