Azure Functions vs Google Cloud Run

Azure Functions and Google Cloud Run cannot be scored on the same axes — one of them does not publish a rate for everything serverless functions bills on.

List prices checked

Rate cards side by side

Only the axes at least one of them bills on. A dash means that provider does not charge for it.

Billing axisAzure FunctionsGoogle Cloud RunDifference
Free tierYesYes

Source: Microsoft pricing (May 2026) · Google pricing (May 2026). Published list prices only — committed-use discounts, regional variation, and per-request charges are not included. Not yet independently re-checked against the vendor’s page.

Monthly cost for three real workloads

The rate cards applied to identical usage. This is where the winner changes.

WorkloadAzure FunctionsGoogle Cloud RunCheaper
Side projectA personal site or small app with modest traffic, a few gigabytes of assets, and one small always-on process.Not comparable
Growing SaaSA funded product serving a few thousand daily users, with an image-heavy frontend and two application servers.Not comparable
Media-heavy siteA publisher or video product where delivery dominates the bill and compute is almost an afterthought.Not comparable

Workload definitions are identical on every comparison page, so figures here can be read against any other pair in the same category.

What each one is for

Azure Functions

by Microsoft

Microsoft's event-driven compute, with a consumption plan matching Lambda's economics and premium plans that trade scale-to-zero for predictable latency.

Free tier: 1M executions and 400,000 GB-seconds per month

Google Cloud Run

by Google

Runs any container with scale-to-zero and request-based autoscaling, billed per 100 ms. The most flexible option in the category because there is no runtime lock-in.

Free tier: 2M requests and 180,000 vCPU-seconds per month

Common questions

Is Azure Functions or Google Cloud Run cheaper in 2026?
Neither can be scored across all three workloads, because at least one of them does not publish a rate for every axis this category bills on.
Which has the better free tier, Azure Functions or Google Cloud Run?
Both publish one. Azure Functions: 1M executions and 400,000 GB-seconds per month. Google Cloud Run: 2M requests and 180,000 vCPU-seconds per month.
What do these estimates not include?
Committed-use and reserved discounts, regional price variation, per-request API charges, support plans, and minimum retention periods. All of those move real invoices, sometimes by a lot. These figures compare published list prices for the same workload, which is the comparison the rate cards alone cannot give you.

Other comparisons in this category