Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Large

Mistral Large is cheaper for every workload modelled here.

List prices checked

Specifications and rates

PropertyClaude Opus 5Mistral Large
Input per 1M$5.00$2.00
Output per 1M$25.00$6.00
Cached input per 1M$0.500
Blended (3:1)$10.00$3.00
Context window200K131K
Max output64K
Inputs acceptedtext, imagetext

Source: Anthropic pricing (August 2026) · Mistral AI pricing (May 2026). Published list prices only — committed-use discounts, regional variation, and per-request charges are not included. Not yet independently re-checked against the vendor’s page.

Monthly cost by workload

Identical token volumes through both rate cards. Output-heavy profiles are where the ranking flips.

WorkloadClaude Opus 5Mistral LargeCheaper
In-app chat assistantA support or help assistant handling a few thousand conversations a month, with short prompts and short answers.$225$70Mistral Largesaves $155/mo (69%)
RAG over documentsRetrieval-augmented answering where each request stuffs several retrieved passages into the prompt, so input dominates.$1,875$690Mistral Largesaves $1,185/mo (63%)
Coding agentAn agentic loop that reads files and writes patches, generating heavy output and re-sending large context on every turn.$4,500$1,400Mistral Largesaves $3,100/mo (69%)

What each one is for

Claude Opus 5

by Anthropic

Anthropic's model for complex agentic coding and enterprise work. Prompt caching cuts repeated input to a tenth of the base rate, which for an agent resending the same context every turn matters more than the headline price.

Mistral Large

by Mistral AI

The French lab's flagship, priced below every US frontier model and hosted in the EU, which is often the deciding factor rather than the benchmark scores.

Common questions

Is Claude Opus 5 or Mistral Large cheaper in 2026?
Mistral Large, for every workload modelled here. On a blended 3:1 basis it costs $3.00 per million tokens against Claude Opus 5's $10.00.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 5, at 200K tokens against 131K. A larger window only helps if you can afford to fill it — the cost of one full-context request is in the table above.
Which is cheaper for output-heavy work like agents?
Mistral Large, at $6.00 per million output tokens against $25.00. Reasoning tokens bill as output, so for agentic loops this axis usually decides the invoice regardless of what the input rates look like.
What is not included in these figures?
Batch-processing discounts, fine-tuning, long-context surcharges above a provider's standard tier, and any enterprise agreement. These are published pay-as-you-go list prices, checked against each provider's own pricing page on the date shown.
Is switching from Claude Opus 5 to Mistral Large worth it?
On price alone it is about 70% cheaper on a blended basis. Whether that survives contact with your workload depends on output quality and on retry rate — a cheaper model that needs two attempts is not cheaper. Model the specific volumes in the calculator before you migrate.

Other model comparisons