Gemini 2.5 Pro alternatives

9 models of comparable capability, ranked by blended token price. Gemini 2.5 Pro stays in the table, highlighted, as the baseline.

List prices checked

Ranked by blended token price

Cheapest first, at three input tokens per output token.

#ModelProviderInputOutputBlendedvs Gemini 2.5 ProContext
1DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$0.435$0.870$0.5446.3× cheaper1M
2Mistral LargeMistral AI$2.00$6.00$3.001.1× cheaper131K
3GPT-5OpenAI$1.25$10.00$3.441× dearer400K
4Gemini 2.5 Proyou are hereGoogle$1.25$10.00$3.441M
5OpenAI o3OpenAI$2.00$8.00$3.501× dearer200K
6Cohere Command ACohere$2.50$10.00$4.381.3× dearer256K
7Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$3.00$15.00$6.001.7× dearer200K
8Grok 4xAI$3.00$15.00$6.001.7× dearer256K
9Claude Opus 5Anthropic$5.00$25.00$10.003.3× dearer200K
10Claude Fable 5Anthropic$10.00$50.00$20.005× dearer200K

Source: Google pricing (May 2026). Published list prices only — committed-use discounts, regional variation, and per-request charges are not included. Not yet independently re-checked against the vendor’s page.

Questions

What is the best alternative to Gemini 2.5 Pro in 2026?
On blended token price, DeepSeek-V4-Pro is the cheapest comparable option — about 6.3× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro. Price is only half the decision: a model that costs 70% less but needs a second attempt on hard prompts is not a saving.
Which alternative is cheapest for output-heavy work?
Rank on the output column rather than the blended figure. Reasoning and agentic loops bill their thinking as output, so a model with cheap input and expensive output can end up the most costly option on the page despite looking competitive here.
Do these alternatives have the same context window?
No — the context column varies by more than 8× across this table. If you are feeding whole documents or codebases, filter on window size first and only then compare price, because a cheaper model that cannot hold your input is not an alternative at all.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro directly