DeepSeek-V4-Pro alternatives

9 models of comparable capability, ranked by blended token price. DeepSeek-V4-Pro stays in the table, highlighted, as the baseline.

List prices checked

Ranked by blended token price

Cheapest first, at three input tokens per output token.

#ModelProviderInputOutputBlendedvs DeepSeek-V4-ProContext
1DeepSeek-V4-Proyou are hereDeepSeek$0.435$0.870$0.5441M
2Mistral LargeMistral AI$2.00$6.00$3.005× dearer131K
3GPT-5OpenAI$1.25$10.00$3.445× dearer400K
4Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle$1.25$10.00$3.445× dearer1M
5OpenAI o3OpenAI$2.00$8.00$3.505× dearer200K
6Cohere Command ACohere$2.50$10.00$4.3810× dearer256K
7Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$3.00$15.00$6.0010× dearer200K
8Grok 4xAI$3.00$15.00$6.0010× dearer256K
9Claude Opus 5Anthropic$5.00$25.00$10.0010× dearer200K
10Claude Fable 5Anthropic$10.00$50.00$20.00Infinity× dearer200K

Source: DeepSeek pricing (August 2026). Published list prices only — committed-use discounts, regional variation, and per-request charges are not included. Not yet independently re-checked against the vendor’s page.

Questions

What is the best alternative to DeepSeek-V4-Pro in 2026?
Nothing in the same capability tier is cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Pro on a blended basis, which makes it the value pick of its tier. Moving down a tier would cut cost further at some cost in capability.
Which alternative is cheapest for output-heavy work?
Rank on the output column rather than the blended figure. Reasoning and agentic loops bill their thinking as output, so a model with cheap input and expensive output can end up the most costly option on the page despite looking competitive here.
Do these alternatives have the same context window?
No — the context column varies by more than 8× across this table. If you are feeding whole documents or codebases, filter on window size first and only then compare price, because a cheaper model that cannot hold your input is not an alternative at all.

Compare DeepSeek-V4-Pro directly