Claude Haiku 4.5 alternatives

8 models of comparable capability, ranked by blended token price. Claude Haiku 4.5 stays in the table, highlighted, as the baseline.

List prices checked

Ranked by blended token price

Cheapest first, at three input tokens per output token.

#ModelProviderInputOutputBlendedvs Claude Haiku 4.5Context
1DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek$0.140$0.280$0.17511.4× cheaper1M
2Grok 3 minixAI$0.300$0.500$0.3505.7× cheaper131K
3CodestralMistral AI$0.300$0.900$0.4504.4× cheaper262K
4GPT-5 miniOpenAI$0.250$2.00$0.6882.9× cheaper400K
5Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle$0.300$2.50$0.8502.4× cheaper1M
6OpenAI o4-miniOpenAI$1.10$4.40$1.931× dearer200K
7Claude Haiku 4.5you are hereAnthropic$1.00$5.00$2.00200K
8GPT-4.1OpenAI$2.00$8.00$3.501.7× dearer1M
9GPT-4oOpenAI$2.50$10.00$4.382× dearer128K

Source: Anthropic pricing (August 2026). Published list prices only — committed-use discounts, regional variation, and per-request charges are not included. Not yet independently re-checked against the vendor’s page.

Questions

What is the best alternative to Claude Haiku 4.5 in 2026?
On blended token price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash is the cheapest comparable option — about 11.4× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Price is only half the decision: a model that costs 70% less but needs a second attempt on hard prompts is not a saving.
Which alternative is cheapest for output-heavy work?
Rank on the output column rather than the blended figure. Reasoning and agentic loops bill their thinking as output, so a model with cheap input and expensive output can end up the most costly option on the page despite looking competitive here.
Do these alternatives have the same context window?
No — the context column varies by more than 8× across this table. If you are feeding whole documents or codebases, filter on window size first and only then compare price, because a cheaper model that cannot hold your input is not an alternative at all.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 directly